Wednesday, 10 Jun 2009
Is it ethical to accept financial if you don’t need the funds?
I recently applied for a certificate program (meaning less coursework than an associate’s degree) at a local community college. In-state tuition is not expensive and I applied with the full intention of paying for whatever courses are required. However, along the way, during my application process, I found out about a state-run grant program.
The program is not need-based. The only requirements are to be a resident of this state, enroll in a certificate or diploma program at an eligible school within the state, and maintain a ‘B’ average. Eligible applicants will have all their tuition paid as well as receive a book allowance for each quarter or semester. While talking to SavvyDad last night, I mentioned that I hoped to be able to receive the grant and would ask the school once my application is complete. He commented that I shouldn’t take the money since I don’t need it.
I disagree. The program doesn’t make any distinction regarding financial need. In addition, I am not being dishonest in order to qualify. For me, if I qualify for the funds, I will accept the funds. It’s fewer dollars out of my pocket. So, faithful readers, what do you think?



June 15th, 2009 at 3:55 PM
I agree with you. If there’s a grant program that’s being offered and there’s no inclome restrictions then why shouldn’t you apply for it? So many of these programs go un used and the money is left on the table. You actually want to use it and make it work for you! I say go for it!!!